.3 percent or 20 percent are both unacceptable high risk thresholds when we are discussing human extinction.
I suppose it's not all bad though, as I've noted here with regard to entropy, if all we are is a collection of self-aware atoms, the universe discovering itself and resisting its own entropy, than perhaps AI is better suited to fulfil this goal than we are.
Symposium: It's hard to bet on human extinction
Hi Rohit. I published an essay this week talking about the virtues of public libraries, hopefully this is something everyone can agree is a good idea: https://howaboutthis.substack.com/p/public-libraries-awesome-things
.3 percent or 20 percent are both unacceptable high risk thresholds when we are discussing human extinction.
I suppose it's not all bad though, as I've noted here with regard to entropy, if all we are is a collection of self-aware atoms, the universe discovering itself and resisting its own entropy, than perhaps AI is better suited to fulfil this goal than we are.